Workplace conflict is one of the most persistent and misunderstood challenges in any organization. Whether you’re leading a Fortune 500 company, managing a nonprofit, running a school, or even navigating family dynamics, conflict seems to follow people wherever they go. And our instinct is usually to blame the individuals involved; after all, who’s there when things go wrong? People. And people can be very annoying.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth: the people involved in a conflict are usually just the most visible part of a much deeper problem. When we cling to the mistaken belief that workplace conflict would simply disappear if those “annoying people” would just get themselves together and work things out, we end up saying and doing things that cause the conflict to persist, and to create even more damage to both organizations and the people in them.
If we truly want to solve conflict at work, we’ve got to do some digging.
The Iceberg Beneath the Conflict
Consider this real-world scenario: A CEO once brought in a consultant to work with two senior executives, let’s call them Amy and Bill. They were locked in a serious, ongoing conflict. The CEO described it as a “communication problem.” Simple enough, right?
But when Amy and Bill were interviewed individually, they told a different story. They didn’t see it as a communication issue at all. Instead, they saw it as fundamental differences in departmental opinions about how work should be done, rooted in their beliefs about each other’s functional roles.
Then came the real revelation. When the consultant interviewed Amy and Bill’s team members and other people throughout the organization, the picture expanded dramatically. Underneath what appeared to be a person-to-person conflict, or even a departmental disagreement, lay deeply embedded structures. These included:
- Company history and institutional memory
- Cultural norms that had developed over years
- Work processes and procedures that created friction
- Ambiguous role definitions and overlapping responsibilities
Amy and Bill were really only the tip of a proverbial iceberg. Blaming them individually or sending them off to communication training or anger management classes would never solve the problem. The real work requires excavating what’s underneath the conflict, bringing it into the open, and analyzing the systemic forces at play.
Steps to Resolve Workplace Conflict
Here are five proven steps you can take to address and resolve conflict wherever you are whether you’re a manager, a team leader, an HR professional, or simply someone who wants a healthier work environment.
Ask the Right People the Right Questions
You might assume the best place to start is at the top with the people who have power and status. But this approach rarely works because senior leaders are often too far removed from the real action on the ground.
Instead, you need to interview the people who are experiencing events firsthand. And you need a full range of their opinions. Even though each person will try to give you their honest perspective, every individual viewpoint is inherently incomplete. It’s bounded by their personal experiences and perceptions.
By gathering a broad range of views, you can start to see the patterns and dynamics operating beneath the surface.
Here are some powerful questions to ask:
- “Can you tell me what goes right here?” — This opens the conversation on a positive note and reveals what’s actually working.
- “What’s the thing that whenever it happens, it makes you nuts?” — This gets to the heart of recurring frustrations.
- “Is there something that would help you do your job better?” — This uncovers practical, actionable needs.
- “Why do you stay if there are so many problems here?” — This reveals underlying motivation, loyalty, and what people value about the organization despite its flaws.
Ensure Alignment Around Goals and Responsibilities
This step is critical, and it’s where many organizations fail without even realizing it.
You need to make sure that everyone has a consistent understanding of:
- What the goals actually are
- Who is responsible for which decisions
- Who does what, for whom, and when
- Who has budget authority
- Who gets credit for success
You would be amazed at how many sincere, well-meaning people can have deep disagreements about these seemingly basic questions.
Here’s a telling example: At one organization, a senior leader assigned overlapping responsibility for the same territory to two different executives. These two executives and their teams fought for an entire year over who got to call which shots and who would take the blame for declining performance.
The human resources group tried to facilitate a truce and encourage better behavior. But nothing changed until the senior leader departed and the overlapping assignments were brought fully to light and completely redefined.
The lesson? It’s nearly impossible to resolve conflict through goodwill alone when two different people are standing in the same space with the same mandate. Structural clarity must come first.
Find Allies at All Levels
Even if you’ve ruled out dysfunctional individuals, asked the right questions, and achieved alignment around goals — if you don’t have a critical mass of participation, nothing substantial is going to happen.
You need allies throughout the organization to help implement change.
Consider this scenario: At one organization, there was persistent conflict within the executive team itself. But a group of mid-level managers, who desperately needed to get their work done, were willing to collaborate on concrete, practical solutions in ways their bosses were not.
Over time, these mid-level allies built bridges across departments. They communicated new concepts down to their teams. And eventually, they were able to start managing up, influencing the executive team’s behavior and creating better performance, better productivity, and noticeably better conduct across the organization.
Change doesn’t always have to come from the top. Sometimes the most powerful transformation starts in the middle.
Teach New Habits for Managing Differences
Even after you’ve addressed structural issues, people will still experience interpersonal friction from time to time. Strong feelings and stressful thinking are natural companions of conflict. That’s why it makes sense to equip people with new techniques and habits for managing differences constructively.
Here are three practical techniques that can make a real difference:
Lizard Listening
Our amygdala: the ancient “lizard brain”, interprets emotional cues as if they were present physical danger, even before we have a chance to assess what’s actually going on or process information logically.
The practice: Before responding in a tense conversation, pause and reconsider what you’ve just said or are planning to say. Think about how your counterpart will filter your words through their lizard brain. What misconceptions could arise? What perfectly good intentions might be misconstrued? Are there ways to reframe potential negatives so the conversation becomes more persuasive and positive?
The Evil-Logic Check
When someone bothers us, we tend to cast them as a “bad person.” But here’s a powerful reframe: Ask yourself, “Do I actually think this person is evil?”
The word “evil” is deliberately strong. Most people will immediately step back: “No, she’s not evil, she’s just annoying.”
Then push a little further: “Why would a smart person do such a stupid thing?”
This leading question forces you to reconsider what’s really going on with that annoying colleague. Often, you’ll discover alternative explanations for their behavior. You may even develop some compassion for their situation — because behavior we label as “bad” or “stupid” is usually driven by some form of pressure, fear, or threat.
Elephant Cards
Sometimes there’s something important and true that needs to be said, but it’s just too uncomfortable. Most of us don’t want to put someone on the spot. We don’t like saying things that sound unkind. Raising “undiscussable” subjects can feel genuinely risky.
The solution: Distribute literal “elephant cards”, physical cards that anyone in a meeting can play when there’s something important going unsaid. The simple act of playing the card signals to everyone in the room that it’s now permissible to discuss a topic that would previously have been off-limits.
This technique has proven remarkably durable. Some teams continue using elephant cards years after they’re first introduced, because the practice fundamentally shifts the culture around honest communication.
For more indept knowledge on Workplace conflicts and the psychology behind resolution, enroll in our masters program and advance your career:
